Resources
Air emissions management
Download October 28, 2010

Predicting benzene emissions in refrigeration plants – be careful what simulators tell you!

In Western Canada, companies are required to report benzene emissions from glycol dehydration / regeneration units. In refrigeration plants, ethylene glycol (EG) is typically injected to suppress hydrate formation. The ?rich? EG which has absorbed water from the gas is then regenerated and recirculated back to the process. However, EG also absorbs hydrocarbons such as benzene which are then typically released to the atmosphere in the EG still.


Simulators such as GRI GLYCalc and Aspentech HYSYS are commonly used to predict BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene) emissions from these plants. However, the results from these simulators can also be very inaccurate.



EG Hydrate Prevention Flowsheet (GRI Glycalc)


One key reason why simulators have difficulty with accurately predicting BTEX emissions from refrigeration plants is that the conditions at the low temperature separator can be troublesome for flash calculations. A 3-phase flash calculation (vapour, hydrocarbon liquid, aqueous or EG/water) at low temperatures (in the range of -10 to -30 C) is required, and often the simulators are simply not ?tuned? to properly predict the partition of benzene to the vapour, hydrocarbon liquid and aqueous phases at these conditions, or even to properly predict the existence of each phase.


GRI GLYCalc is known to have difficulties with EG units. According to the GLYCalc documentation, ?In some cases, GLYCalc may fail to predict a hydrocarbon liquid phase when one is actually present. The results produced by the program in this situation should be used with caution.? This can lead to significant overprediction of benzene emissions; in some cases we have seen emissions estimates 15-30 times too high. When constructing the ?DEOS? graph as required by regulators in Western Canada (this graph plots benzene emissions and dry gas water content as a function of glycol circulation rate), a sudden jump or drop in emissions can be an indicator that GLYCalc is failing to properly do the flash calculation at the cold separator.


Aspentech HYSYS has historically been ?tuned? for natural gas processes to accurately perform the vapour-hydrocarbon liquid flash calculation at a wide range of conditions, and the conventional property package in gas processing has been Peng Robinson. However, Peng Robinson is not suitable for predicting BTEX emissions in refrigeration plant glycol units. More recently, the ?Glycol? property package was made available, which does a very good job of predicting BTEX emissions in TEG dehydration units, but has not had as much attention for BTEX emissions in EG units. It is an improvement over Peng Robinson, however, for predicting BTEX emissions in EG units.


Likely the best approach is to ?tune? a simulator property package in HYSYS (or other simulator capable of allowing such modifications). This involves:


  • Gathering relevant experimental and field data ? for EG regeneration, this would ideally be vapour-
    liquid-liquid data at cold separator conditions
  • Regressing interaction parameters for a suitable property package which would ensure an
    accurate partition of BTEX components to the vapour, hydrocarbon liquid and aqueous phases.


This is an approach that Process Ecology has taken in order to accurately predict BTEX, VOC and GHG emissions from EG regeneration units. If you would like to learn more about the results and the details of the thermodynamic models used please contact us.


Do you have questions or comments regarding this article? Click here to contact us.

By Ahad Sarraf Shirazi, M.Sc., P. Eng.

Ahad joined Process Ecology in August 2012 as a Process/Research Engineer. Currently, he is heavily involved with research & development for development of innovative process simulation and optimization tools for the Oil and Gas industry. He holds a dual BSc degree in chemical engineering and polymer science and also an MSc degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Alberta. He brings a unique set of skills in engineering and programming that complements Process Ecology's strengths and provides process engineering support.In his spare time, he likes to be active whether it’s skiing, hiking, biking, or above all SQUASH. He also enjoys programming for fun and trying to develop an Android app for Squash lovers.

Search

Categories

Latest articles

Certifying Natural gas for Methane Emissions Management: Insights into MiQ Framework

January 22, 2024


U.S. EPA and DOE Join Forces to Combat Methane Emissions: A Process Ecology Perspective

October 31, 2023


Critical Minerals and the O&G Industry

September 13, 2023