Resources
Air emissions management
Download April 30, 2012

Gas-driven glycol pumps and the prediction of methane emissions

Gas-driven glycol pumps use fuel gas at high pressure as the motive force to drive the glycol circulation at dehydration units. Kimray pumps use the high-pressure gas from the dehydration unit to drive the pistons. In Kimray pumps, the gas is entrained in the rich glycol which is then released at the regeneration still vent and/or the flash tank (if present). In many installations the entrained gas is released directly to atmosphere representing a significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from these units.

In order to evaluate the volume of gas that is vented at standard conditions, Kimray provides a set of emission factors as a function of the operating pressure. A detailed evaluation of a "typical" dehydration plant in Western Canada by Process Ecology indicated that the reported factors imply assumptions of ideal gas behaviour. When compared to more rigorous calculations using process simulation, some significant deviations for units operating at higher pressures are revealed.

The Kimray documentation notes the following: “If the wet glycol, returning to the pump from the absorber were to completely fill the cylinder, no additional gas would be needed. However, the wet glycol will only occupy approximately 65 percent of the total volume of the cylinder and connecting tubing leaving 35 percent to be filled by gas from the absorber. This gas volume amounts to 1.7 S.C.F. per gallon of dry glycol at 300 psig absorber pressure and 8.3 S.C.F. at 1500 psig and may be considered as continuing power cost for pump operation”.

Taking into consideration that the volume of the cylinder is fixed, the process simulation model employed specifies a fixed “actual” gas volume of 0.081 acf/gal; by specifying an actual volume, the model performs the required thermodynamic calculations to estimate the vented volume at standard conditions for any discharge pressure.


The results from the HYSYS model in use by Process Ecology were compared for the same scenario of a Kimray gas pump operating at 25 GPH at various discharge pressures and these results are found in the following graph:




It can be concluded that the Kimray factors in use to estimate vented volumes are accurate for the lower pressures while introducing more significant errors at higher pressures. The volumes reported by the simulation model will tend be higher, particularly at higher pressures where deviations from ideality are more pronounced.


Do you have questions or comments regarding this article? Click here to contact us.

By Alberto Alva Argaez, Ph.D, MBA

Alberto brings over 25 years of experience in chemical engineering research and process optimization for sustainability. As Senior Project Manager and Managing Partner, Alberto has worked across multiple industries to assist operating companies become more efficient in their use of energy and water. Alberto started his career as production engineer with Bayer and then spent ten years in Academia as research scientist and lecturer. In 1999 he joined Hyprotech/Aspentech in Calgary as product manager for conceptual design software tools and thermodynamics. Alberto later worked for seven years with Natural Resources Canada performing R&D and supporting energy-intensive industrial sectors through process integration and optimization projects. With Process Ecology Alberto has specialized in modeling and optimization for emissions reduction in the oil & gas sector. Alberto is a Biochemical Engineer and holds an MBA from ITESM and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from UMIST, UK.

Search

Categories

Latest articles

Changes to Directive 060: What Alberta’s Upstream Petroleum Producers Need to Know

November 15, 2024


Emissions Forecasting Approaches: Production Estimates and Statistical Models

October 03, 2024


Certifying Natural gas for Methane Emissions Management: Insights into MiQ Framework

January 22, 2024