Resources
Relief / flare studies
Download October 28, 2010

Can a general process simulator be used for flare system design and rating?

Process Ecology has worked with clients on various flare studies through the years and a question which occasionally comes up is whether a process simulator such as Aspentech HYSYS can be used for flare system design and/or rating.

In most cases, dedicated applications such as Aspentech Flarenet or Invensys Visual Flow are much better options for a number of reasons which are outlined here.

The following description applies to HYSYS vs. Flarenet, although many of these items are more generally applicable to other simulators.


Accuracy at high velocities

Most importantly, results can be inaccurate at the conditions normally encountered in flare systems, with a bias to line sizes that are too small. At high velocities, Flarenet is more accurate as it includes the acceleration term in the pressure drop methods. Also, choked flow conditions are checked in Flarenet.


Flare header/lateral sizing calculations

Flarenet provides the ability to do design calculations, meaning that the required header and lateral sizes for the flare network are calculated, ensuring that system constraints such as valve backpressure and velocities are not exceeded. In HYSYS, this could only be done by trial-and-error.


Multiple scenarios

The ability to analyze multiple design/rating scenarios is a benefit of Flarenet. Various relief scenarios associated with a common flare network can be calculated concurrently. In HYSYS, this would require that multiple cases be maintained, and if there is a change in the flare network (e.g., a pipe length) it would have to be updated in all of the cases. In Flarenet, a change to the flare network would easily be applied to all scenarios.


Flexibility with calculation fidelity

With Flarenet, the user has the ability, where warranted, to simplify the calculations for quicker convergence. For example, assuming that the fluid is gas phase only can be significantly faster than using rigorous thermodynamic calculations and two-phase pressure drop methods.


Complex systems

Flare systems which have looped lines, jumpovers, or multiple sinks (flares) can be extremely difficult for HYSYS to solve. This is especially the case with looped lines where the direction of flow is not known in advance. In the figure below, there are many pipes where the direction of flow would be dependent on relative flowrates of the sources (valves):




Flare system simulators have been developed to address the unique requirements of flare studies – in  most cases a general simulator will not do the job.


Do you have questions or comments regarding this article? Click here to contact us.

By James Holoboff, M.Sc., P. Eng.

James has over 30 years of experience in process engineering and emissions management for the chemical and petroleum industries. He brings a strong background in the development and application of computer simulation models to Oil & Gas industry challenges. James worked for Hyprotech/Aspentech for almost 10 years in various capacities including Global Technical Support Manager and Business Development Manager for the Project Services Division. He then spent 5 years providing process engineering and simulation consulting to a number of operating companies and engineering firms. James has been a Managing Partner for Process Ecology for almost 20 years, during this time providing process engineering services, emissions reporting, project management, and software development support. James is a Chemical Engineering graduate from the University of Calgary and holds an MSc in Chemical Engineering from the same institution. In his spare time, when he’s not playing ice hockey or cycling, he is recovering from injuries incurred from those sports.

Search

Categories

Latest articles

Changes to Directive 060: What Alberta’s Upstream Petroleum Producers Need to Know

November 15, 2024


Emissions Forecasting Approaches: Production Estimates and Statistical Models

October 03, 2024


Certifying Natural gas for Methane Emissions Management: Insights into MiQ Framework

January 22, 2024