Air emissions management
Download October 01, 2010

Benzene Emissions Calculations for TEG Units by GLYCalc and HYSYS

GRI-GLYCalc and Aspentech’s HYSYS are simulation tools frequently used to predict benzene  emissions from glycol dehydration units. GLYCalc has been the software of choice for regulatory  agencies in North America with respect to estimating benzene emissions from glycol dehydration units.

The vast majority of dehydration units use Triethylene Glycol (TEG) to remove water from natural gas; the  ability of these software tools to accurately predict benzene emissions in TEG dehydration units is therefore of primary importance for both operators and regulatory agencies. In addition, accurate prediction of dry gas water content is essential for the optimization of dehydration units and for the generation of Dehydrator Engineering and Operations Sheet graphs.

GLYCalc has been successfully used in industry to calculate benzene emissions in TEG units, but there are limitations. As for HYSYS, the Peng Robinson package has historically been the standard for dehydration unit calculations; recently Aspentech introduced a Glycol package which notably has interaction parameters fitted for TEG-BTEX systems.

GPA Research Report 131 (The Solubility of Selected Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Triethylene Glycol) is a key source of equilibrium data for TEG-water-BTEX systems at typical contactor, flash tank and still conditions.

Specifically, we have found that:

  • HYSYS-Peng Robinson, HYSYS-Glycol and GLYCalc all had a reasonable match to the BTEX liquid-phase concentration data from GPA RR-131 at contactor and flash tank conditions.
  • HYSYS-Peng Robinson and HYSYS-Glycol had reasonable matches to BTEX concentration data at regenerator conditions. Given the empirical nature of the relationship used to model the regenerator in GLYCalc, it is difficult to make the comparison; however, we conclude that GLYCalc consistently overpredicts BTEX K-values in the regenerator.
  • HYSYS predicted dry gas water content more accurately than GLYCalc. It is not uncommon for GLYCalc and HYSYS to give vastly different predictions; we conclude that GLYCalc frequently predicts dry gas water contents 50% lower than expected values. HYSYS-Glycol gave the best predictions here.
  • It is further noted that property packages can be modified (most notably by modifying interaction parameters to better represent available experimental and plant data) and selectively applied in HYSYS providing an opportunity to improve on the available methods.

The following figure illustrates the comparison between the RR-131 data, GLYCalc, HYSYS-PR and HYSYS-Glycol at contactor conditions. All methods gave a reasonable match.


Overall, GLYCalc gives reasonable predictions of benzene emissions in TEG units despite some of the shortcut methods used in the calculations. However, it does underpredict dry gas water content so care should be taken when calculating glycol circulation rate requirements.

As for HYSYS, the Glycol package in HYSYS 2006.5 gives excellent results. Care should be taken when using different property packages or older versions of HYSYS.

If you would like the full report, then please click here.

Do you have questions or comments regarding this article? Click here to contact us.

By Alberto Alva Argaez, Ph.D, MBA

Alberto brings over 25 years of experience in chemical engineering research and process optimization for sustainability. As Senior Project Manager and Managing Partner, Alberto has worked across multiple industries to assist operating companies become more efficient in their use of energy and water. Alberto started his career as production engineer with Bayer and then spent ten years in Academia as research scientist and lecturer. In 1999 he joined Hyprotech/Aspentech in Calgary as product manager for conceptual design software tools and thermodynamics. Alberto later worked for seven years with Natural Resources Canada performing R&D and supporting energy-intensive industrial sectors through process integration and optimization projects. With Process Ecology Alberto has specialized in modeling and optimization for emissions reduction in the oil & gas sector. Alberto is a Biochemical Engineer and holds an MBA from ITESM and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from UMIST, UK.



Latest articles

Certifying Natural gas for Methane Emissions Management: Insights into MiQ Framework

January 22, 2024

U.S. EPA and DOE Join Forces to Combat Methane Emissions: A Process Ecology Perspective

October 31, 2023

Critical Minerals and the O&G Industry

September 13, 2023